Sport Obermeyer Case Study Questions, APA

Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P.,
& Simchi-Levi, E. (2008). Designing
and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies and case studies
(3rd
ed.). New York, NY: Richard D. Irwin, Inc. ISBN: 9780073341521.


Case Study 1 Instructions

Read the Sport Obermeyer Case Study in the Simchi-Levi et al. text. Submit a response to each of the end-of-case discussion questions. Each question must be answered thoroughly, and responses must be supported by the concepts introduced in the reading/study materials. Each question/answer must be delineated under a heading in current APA format. Include a title page and reference page also in current APA format. Incorporate a minimum of 5 peer-reviewed sources with at least 1 source per question.

CASE STUDY SPORTS OBERMEYER LINK,

https://www2.isye.gatech.edu/~jvandeva/Classes/6203/2007/Obermeyer.pdf

There is a slight difference in the link and the 3rd edition of the book. Please note the diffence in the page number and table on question one.

FOR :

DQ 1: TABLE 2-20, is on page 89 and it is marked as Table 3-19

RUBIC:

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content 70%

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Synthesis of Knowledge

Focus/Thesis

30%

24 to 23 points*

Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.

22 to 21 points*

Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.

20 to 1 points*

Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment

0 points

Foundation of Knowledge

20%

16 to15 points*

Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.

14 points*

Student exhibits above-average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above-average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.

13 to 1 points*

The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concern in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area

0 points

Application of Knowledge

(Critical Thinking Skills

20%

16 to 15 points*

Student demonstrates a higher level of critical thinking necessary for graduate-level work. Student provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment.

14 points*

Student exhibits a good command of critical-thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above-average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.

13 to 1 points*

Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. Student presents a limited perspective on key concepts throughout assignment. Student appears to have problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.

0 points

Structure 30%

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Organization of Ideas Format

10%

8 points

Student thoroughly understands and excels at explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence.

7 points

Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Student demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above-average level of preparedness, with few formatting errors

6 to 1 points

Student applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous pattern of logical sequencing.

0 points

Writing Skill

10%

8 points*

Student demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style. Presents a thorough, extensive understanding of word usage. Student excels in the selection and development of a well-planned research assignment. Assignment is error-free and reflects student’s ability to prepare graduate-level writing for possible publication in a peer-reviewed (refereed) journal.

7 points*

Student provides an effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment reflects student’s ability to select appropriate word usage and presents an above-average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than 3 errors. Student provides a good final product that covers the above-minimal requirements.

6 to 1 points*

Assignment provides a basic, but borderline, perspective of student’s research abilities. Student has incorporated less than 3 sources, which does not attempt to cover key elements of assignment.

0 points

Research Skill

10%

8 points*

Student provides sophisticated synthesis of complex body of information in the preparation of assignment. Research provided by student contributes significantly to the development of the overall thesis. Student incorporates at least 5 quality references in assignment. Student incorporates a variety of research resources and methodology in the preparation of assignment.

7 points*

Student achieves an above-average synthesis of research, but interpretation is narrow in scope and description within assignment. Assignment contains less than 4 resources, and presents an average overview of key concepts.

6 to 1 points*

Assignment provides a basic, but borderline, perspective of student’s research abilities. Student has incorporated less than 3 sources, which does not attempt to cover key elements of assignment.

0 points

Instructor Comments

Raw Score 80 points

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Order Over WhatsApp Place an Order Online

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

All of our assignments are originally produced, unique, and free of plagiarism.

If yes Order Similar Paper